Review: I Remember You

3 stars. I really treasure Scandinavian noir - especially mysteries/thrillers set in Iceland. I've been twice and - at the risk of offending any locals - feel very at home there. And yes, it really does present a perfect backdrop to explore the dark side of humanity. Unfortunately, this one didn't really capture me the way I was hoping it would - I'll get into why, but it doesn't mean I don't recommend it - it's obviously a successful contribution to the genre. 

I Remember You weaves together two tales: 1) that of a married couple who travel to an isolated village with their widowed friend to fix up an old house, and 2) that of a psychiatrist investigating the vandalism of a school that is seemingly connected to the disappearance of his young son. The main players in both stories have disturbing supernatural experiences that unravel clues and push revelations with devastating consequences for everyone involved.

Pros: the setting - omg - I just love it. Such a unique type of remoteness out there in Iceland, especially in winter. Some of the spooky moments are very well done, invoking imagery just begging for adaptation. The ending, as well, really took things to a place I admire. That final page almost had me forgiving some of the things I didn't enjoy.

Cons: predictable. Unlikeable characters - and not the crunchy, interesting kind - the bland, annoying kind. Perhaps one too many narrative elements/connections, many of which had me sort of scratching my head trying to piece things together. I practically skimmed a lot of it... I just wasn't hooked. I couldn't concentrate on it.

I would recommend this as a bridge between Scandi noir/crime thrillers and horror. It's gateway scary - maybe a little amateurish. But that doesn't mean it's bad; only that I'm maybe not the right audience. Still, I found myself wishing for a lot more here. 

I Remember You on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Old Bones (Nora Kelly #1)

3 stars. Nora Kelly has grown from her Utah days, and so did these authors. This one is much shorter, punchier, and to the point than the previous two NK books, but it also, IMO, lacks a lot of the warmth and soul as well. It's very procedure-y (from both a detective/mystery standpoint and an archeological one), and somehow makes the fascinating legends surrounding a truly crazy, horrific true story dry as a bone (lol).

Nora returns to her Institute in Santa Fe after the loss of her husband. She's approached by a historian who wants her to lead an expedition to find the Lost Camp of the ill-fated Donner Party. Everything - the trip out, the initial excavation, the discovery of the camp and the bones left there - is straightforward. Until, of course, it isn't, and new bodies start turning up. Also - there's treasure!

It should have hooked me. All the ingredients are there. The Donner Party is one of my favorite rabbit holes. I enjoy a crunchy, contained crime spree with insane motivations. I love treasure. But this just wasn't my favorite. I never became emotionally invested in any of the characters - not Corrie Swanson (I have a hard enough time proving myself in the workplace IRL), not Clive Benton, not Peel or Maggie or the other hollow members of the team, not Nora Kelly. It felt rushed. It felt a little like reading Dan Brown. The heart just wasn't there.

Still - I basically couldn't put it down. This style of writing here is so, so refreshing to me. Straightforward, intentional, precise. I really loved that aspect and I look forward to continuing on with the series. The plot drives you onward as needed and there are even a few appearances by beloved characters from past encounters. If you're a fan, go for it. Slightly disappointed but I have zero regrets. 

Old Bones on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Cabinet of Curiosities

4 stars. I am INTO THESE BOOKS. Surprise of the year and I couldn't be happier about it. I'm about to buy the rest in the Nora Kelly series and see where I land after that in the giant Pendergast Universe. So glad there are so many to choose from! I loved how different this was from Thunderhead, with similar history-mystery-mysterious-museum-archeological vibes. (These books remind me of the National Treasure movies, my favorite of all time, so keep in mind I am someone who would be super into them. Right up my alley.)

This one takes place in New York, after a giant pit of bones turns up at a construction site. FBI Special Agent Pendergast takes a special interest in the case, and involves Nora Kelly and her journalist boyfriend, Bill Smithback. Kelly is now working at the New York Museum of Natural History and becomes embroiled in a tangled web of politics, that very specific NY-style of greed, jurisdiction fights, workplace pitfalls and - unfortunately, the biggest threat of all: MURDER. 

Okay - that's a terrible summary. But these books actually go really deep. They're complex! There are multiple characters with multiple motivations and POVs. There are a lot of conflicting themes and clues and avenues for our heroes to investigate, and somehow - though they are racing against the clock - it feels like they take their time. It's a hearty narrative, one you can really sink your teeth into. And no part of it felt sloppy or lazy or worth skipping.

I was a little disappointed with the final "twist" (there were a few too many "reveals," I think) but I was totally glued to the page as the action ramped up and the stakes got REALLY high. I can only double down on my admiration of these authors and I'm so excited to have something that's perfect to read on a plane, on a train, on the beach, while brushing my teeth because I can't look away... 

The Cabinet of Curiosities on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: All the Sinners Bleed

5 stars. Damn. This book is incredible. Cosby is back with a nail-biting, stomach-churning, electric thriller that will undoubtedly burrow under your skin and make a home there. 

I mentioned this in my review of Razorblade Tears, but as a Virginian born-and-raised, it's odd - rare, even - to get to take in such an accurate portrait of my state; all of its pockets and contradictions and extremes and microsocieties rendered without the inevitable attempt to balance the scales. Virginia granted me many things - a secure childhood, breathtakingly beautiful surroundings, four wonderful seasons, the best college experience anyone could hope for - but that shouldn't count towards forgiveness of any of its stubborn atrocities. Virginia is what it is. Many things can be true at once. I hope it gets better. I appreciate Cosby's frankness around this.

But I digress. This book is thought-provoking like that. It’s about a Black sheriff in a small town doing the best he can despite rural resources and rising racial tensions. After a horrifying school shooting, he is catapulted into a crazy investigation that only aggravates the town's passionate residents. On the hunt for a serial killer, the sheriff ends up racing against the clock to catch a serial killer and save the town he loves. A town that often, on many days, maybe even on most days, does not love him back.

Titus - the sheriff, with a great name - is a terrific character. The way Cosby weaves in his personal and professional relationships is truly impressive. Again he tackles so much: racism, masculinity, trauma, change, family, love, tradition, fear. Grief:

"That he went about these tasks so adroitly after staring into the depths of the abyss that was what passed for the souls of those three sociopaths made him feel unclean. He knew better than most that the wheel of life would keep spinning, with little regard to the families who had lost their children or the children who had lost their lives. Waiting for the world to shed tears for your pain was like waiting for a statue to speak. So you filed the reports, you answered the emails. You carried on as best you could."

He isn't heavy-handed. It's just... true. And this time he does it through a religious lens, which is truly fascinating and creates an enormously compelling mystery. It isn't perfect. There's clumsy dialogue, loose ends, a bit of a rushed ending, and some disruptive exposition. But whatever points it may have lost for that it earned right back when it got my heart pounding - racing - on the train. 

Cosby has become a must read for me, and I'm glad many others feel the same. His success is well-deserved.

All the Sinners Bleed on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Presumed Innocent

3 stars. I once heard - ages ago - that this book was the epitome of a page turner, extremely suspenseful and one of the best legal thrillers out there. It isn't my usual genre, but I think it's healthy to branch out every now and then and truthfully, I never mind a good courtroom drama. This book definitely delivers the drama.

We are pulled almost instantly into the local politics of Kindle County, as Rusty Sabich, chief deputy prosecutor, attends the funeral of one of his colleagues, who was brutally murdered, and also at one time was the subject of an intense obsession. His motivation to solve the case is complicated by the lingering traces of their affair, an upcoming election, and political corruption that goes deeper and wider than he ever considered. 

I went in fairly blind, but I joked about wondering if and how it would pass the Bechdel test (it didn't. The only female characters were the victim - busty, blonde, perfume-y, loved anal sex - and the perpetrator, who was portrayed as your typical entitled shrew.). I was surprised though at how outdated, in almost every way, it felt. Ready yourself for misogyny, racism, classism, homophobia, and everything else that seeped through society in the late 80's - and in some ways, still does.

On the other hand, believe it or not, I have zero complaints about the writing style. Everything else aside, this dry, crunchy prose zips along and I think I'll miss it when I inevitably move back to purple fantasy or cosmic horror. It takes real skill to nail a story like this from the big picture narrative down to the word choice, and I think I understand what the hype is about. Just trying to be fair.

There was definitely a point in which I was kind of like, oh, this is going to be that type of book, is it? I certainly rolled my eyes more than once (like when he was turned on by the coroner's photographs LOL). But - I liked it. I was very captivated. I admire the author's knowledge, abilities and style. It's clearly a classic and I firmly believe that we shouldn't stay away from things - or, ahem, modify them - simply because they're outdated. 

Presumed Innocent on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Pale Blue Eye

5 stars. WOW WOW WOW. Believe it or not, this was a re-read. I specifically remember pulling it off the shelf at the library when I must have been - oh, maybe 15 (?!). I was a huge fan of mysteries and of Poe, already reading way above YA-level, so I must've been interested, until I apparently read it, immediately forgot all of it, and then randomly rated it 2 stars on GR years later. A bit ironic, considering I'd now call it unforgettable.

In the early days of West Point Academy, when even the existence of America's military fluctuates based on politics and opinion, a tragedy has occurred: the death of a cadet. Retired constable Gus Landor is pulled away from his isolated farm to investigate the horrific mutilation of the body, and must enlist the services of a cadet - a young poet named Edgar Allen Poe - for assistance. With few leads and many suspects, the two forge a strong friendship despite, or because of, the strange darkness of the crimes they seek to solve.

This is a deeply engrossing, atmospheric, Gothic-adjacent piece of historical fiction. I was immediately charmed by its tone of voice - both tones of voice - and the wry humor threading its way through the suspense and intrigue. It was easy going, because I was very interested, but it also had me flexing some muscles I gained as an English Lit major I haven't used in a long time. Speaking of which, this book should absolutely be studied.

I should mention that my opinion of this around the 75% mark was different. I thought everything was a bit too obvious, the villain too predictable, the second half draggy, and that our detective didn't even do that much, well, detecting. But I shouldn't have doubted: the storyteller lands the plane with an incredibly satisfying, thrilling, thump to the ground. I am a little bit in awe.

Is it perfect? Of course not. Every now and then I found myself laughing, unsure if I was laughing with the author or at him. That wry humor could've easily veered into an obnoxious pretentiousness - Bayard is obviously incredibly talented, and knows it. And yes, I think maybe the twist will piss off some readers, if they make it there. Cartoonish? It's something. But I, going on gut alone, think Poe would have approved. Does it all make sense? Does it track perfectly? Does it matter?

I would've liked to spend more time with Landor and Poe. They felt like family, by the end... forgivable of their flaws, perhaps even honorable because of them. But there couldn't, or shouldn't, be a second team-up, it would be impossible and cheaply composed and contrary to the corner of this story that is tragic. Another re-read, then, in the future, when I've again forgotten the twists and turns - or maybe when I haven't, and can read it with a sneakier eye. 

The Pale Blue Eye on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Exiles (Aaron Falk #3)

3 stars. I really love Jane Harper and I've read everything she's written. I'm smitten with her style and happy for her success. And I'm so grateful I was able to snag this from the library! It really is an excellent, compelling thriller with an extremely satisfying ending. Unfortunately, I found myself speeding through not because I felt driven to get answers, but because I felt driven to get through it.

Aaron Falk returns to a small wine town in South Australia for the christening of his godson. A year prior, a member of the family went missing under suspicious, if not tragic, circumstances. Being who he is, Falk can't help but be drawn to the case as he is indirectly connected to it. So many questions: suspects? motives? coincidences? fabrications? and ultimately: where is she? The answers are as transformative for the town as they are for Falk, who faces personal choices of his own.

Alright, let's get right down to it: I found Falk's journey in this book - the romance, the found family, the career moves - to be extremely cheesy and predictable, like almost to the point of cringey. Maybe I'm just jealous... I too pine for the quiet, small town life with a too-good-to-be-true partner and gallons of wine... but ultimately I lost respect for the character. Falk as a family man? Where's his prickly edge? And what - I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck was with that scene when he basically started crying after a woman he barely knew rejected him?!?!?

He also didn't really do that much, well, detecting. The answers just kind of literally unfolded before him, as I guess people were all too willing to provide them often without him even asking. Sure, he's as perceptive and observant as ever, but it's like he didn't even try. He just walked around picking up the puzzle pieces others dropped directly in his path. I dunno! The whole thing didn't feel sharp or zesty or dark enough for me.

That being said! I really did enjoy the mystery. I especially loved the ending. I guess you could say that the perpetrator turned out to be the person I wanted it to be. She took it easy on us, in that sense. Justice was served, and all that. But even that was really anticlimactic and... un-exciting! Where was the final confrontation, the chase, the life-or-death stakes? Again, I dunno! I was kind of disappointed.

Jane Harper, and this series, will continue to be a must-read for me. I adore getting a colloquial glimpse at Australia and she can weave a good tale. I love her writing and the short chapters and I can't deny that her argument for choosing meaningful connection is a convincing one (it’s like, as a person I want what’s best for him. But as a reader…). She clearly does her research - in this case, the wine stuff felt really accurate and interesting. And it's not that I don't recommend this - I do. It just lands a solid 3 stars this time, for me.

Exiles on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Speaks the Nightbird (Matthew Corbett #1)

5 stars, but I would give this 10 if I could. This is by far one of the best books I've ever read. Most well-written, most enjoyable, most entertaining, most impressive, most well-plotted... it really tops the lists for all of those categories. It'll be in my best of the year list, and also my forever favorites. This is a must-read for fans of horror, historical fiction and immersive mysteries. It will keep even the most well-seasoned reader guessing and glued to the story. I cannot say enough good things. It bought me so much joy. 

Speaks the Nightbird takes place at the very end of the 1600s. The New World has been colonized but not conquered, as many new settlements struggle to prosper with so many threats: the climate, the soil, wild beasts, Indians... and most recently, the work of the devil. Fount Royal, the southernmost colony in the Carolinas, seems doomed to fail thanks to the curse of a witch, who allegedly murdered her husband (plus the town's reverend) and committed a few other delightfully unspeakable acts.

Having accused and jailed the witch but aware she is by law innocent until proven guilty, the town's founder sends for a magistrate from the nearby Charles Town to judge the case and provide sentencing, who arrives under somewhat unsteady circumstances with his trusted clerk, Matthew Corbett. And so we are off. 

Off on an investigation so twisty, so dark, so intense that maybe, like me, you'll need to put together a list of suspects on your phone and obsess over the details so you won't miss a single clue (“has a mysterious sack in his barn” really played out in a fun way eh?). Maybe you'll be compelled to discuss it at length with those around you because you can't stop thinking about the characters or the world or the answers to the many questions. Maybe you'll get a few things right, but likely you won't. It's genius in that way.

Matthew Corbett is a great, if somewhat unlucky, hero. Sort of... a Sherlock Holmes type with all the feeeeeeelings and frustrations and follies of being young (and in this case, in love). He is not perfect, nor is he your typical romantic alpha. And yet watching him basically fumble his way through this mystery was a wonderfully rich and sometimes humorous experience, because even as things went wrong at every turn, he stayed true to himself. I really look forward to continuing his journey.

I can't say I've ever, as an adult, been so transported by a book. It is written as though the author literally saw the events unfold before him and he transcribed them so smoothly and vividly I felt like I was there watching with him. (Speaking of, why??? how??? has this not been adapted yet?? HBO?!?!) It's a particular type of sustenance to the soul: like brain food, like a soak in a hot tub, like a hike or a drive when the leaves peak in Autumn, like a sip of expensive whiskey (or apple beer). This book made me fall in love with reading all over again.

Speaks the Nightbird on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Demon (Six Stories #6)

4 stars. Absolutely devastated that this may be the end of one of my favorite series of all time. I picked up the first book when I really needed it - needed an easy, compelling distraction from the stress of living, and I immediately bought the rest, which... I don't think has happened since before I knew how to read. I would just hate to say goodbye to Scott King forever. My true crime- mystery- creepy horror-loving heart is broken.

In Demon, King decides to rake over the grave of a young boy named Sydney Parsons, who was murdered in 1995 by two other boys of his age. The crime took place in a very small town called Ussalthwaite, which appears cozy and picturesque even as its residents skirt around strange happenings and eerie history. Scott of course interviews those connected directly or indirectly with the tragedy, attempting to track down answers to the many questions swirling: primarily, motive. As with all of the Six Stories books, there's an undercurrent of the supernatural that absolutely delivers serious chills in each interview.

Other reviewers have noted that this ends with a touch more ambiguity than some of the others, which on one hand is frustrating, but only I think because the others land so clearly, with solid, grounding answers that give a sense of completion. Leaving elements of the story open-ended undeniably made it a scarier book, and therefore, naturally, I'm really, really into it. 

I also noticed that this one had a somewhat stronger, or maybe less subtle, agenda to it. Don't get me wrong, the last few years of politics and pandemics and promotion of ignorance have filled me with enough rage to fill even the coziest of lighthearted novels with attacks on society's current, perplexing, direction. And Matt Wesolowsi always - admirably - explores big themes in his mysteries. In this case, nature vs nurture vs neglect, punishment vs rehabilitation, criminal rights, prison reform, the justice system... But here his views are a little more loud. He took the flying brick approach. And I don't hate it (in fact I agree with it), but I did find it slightly distracting.

And I can't forget to mention that there was a UDD. And yes, my instinct told me to dock a star for it, but I didn't, because he included a suitably written trigger warning. That way I didn't have to spend the whole time stressed about the dog, I could just skip over detailed descriptions of her so I didn't get too attached. (Appropriate time to mention that this is probably the darkest, maybe most disturbing, of them all, which is saying something. You've been warned.)

I should also say - I had absolutely 0 theories for this one, leading up to the very last few pages. Typically in the middle of a Six Stories book I'd tell my husband my theory (who, despite having no context or understanding, took notes so he could validate me later), and I'd say I was right in 4/6 books. But this one? Left me totally guessing. I was like, fake death? Twins? Evil doppelgänger? Dissassociative identity disorder or multiple personalities? WTF Is going on here?!?! WTF was with the creepy singing?!?! I NEED MORE!!

I cannot say enough good stuff about this series. Each book offers its own unique, but familiar at the same time, flavor. I've mentioned this before, but what should have gotten stale after 3+ books only got better. I wish - hope with my whole heart - that there will be more. Otherwise, I'll be returning again and again simply just to study these and to relive their many, many profound, emotional, delightful twists and turns.

So… Kelly, why 4 stars? I don’t know, really, I assign star ratings based on gut instinct and I never really regarded these books as flawless, or technically perfect - there’s a lot of context and run-on stuff… it’s sort of like, the date was okay but the sex was awesome. Don’t worry about it, just read these fucking books, I’m out.

*sniff* Until next time...

Demon on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Deity (Six Stories #5)

4 stars. OMG these are the absolute best. Happy to report that I did NOT predict the twist this time - I've never been so happy to be totally wrong! I was a bit nervous when I read the synopsis (tackling the Me Too Movement is hard on a good day), but I shouldn't have been. The subject was handled as sensitively and considerately as possible while also delivering the delightful gut punch I've learned to expect.

In Deity, Scott King decides to rake up the grave of pop star Zach Crystal, who died in a fire in his isolated mansion after a wildly successful career. Crystal was the type of star who attracted wildly devoted fans, many of them young teenage girls, and many of whom have now accused him of taking advantage of their devotion. Once again King interviews six individuals connected directly or indirectly to Zach's life, career, and alleged crimes, and once again King unravels a story that's as spooky as it is shocking.

Ahhh. This one felt really icky. There were a lot of parallels between Zach Crystal and Michael Jackson, which... just speaks for itself. It was an icky reckoning when it happened and it's an icky thing to re-live. But these stories must be told, and we must believe them. That's absolutely non-negotiable. The spooky elements in fact were a lot less scary because, well, we should all know by now - human monsters are more frightening and horrible than any animal in the forest.

I am more impressed with each book. The dark themes are tackled with such respect for everyone involved. I love the deft examination of guilt and blame in a situation when someone is hugely talented and successful and surrounded by the word "yes" - how both the enabler and the enabled can be guilty. How money plays into it. How attention plays into it. How fear plays into it. Having just watched the documentary Stolen Youth, I noticed that some of the grooming/manipulation techniques were spot-on. Terrifying.

Super excited to read the next one and I really, really hope it won't be the last.

Deity on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads