Review: Dark Tales

4 stars. Proud of myself for finishing a book, although it probably took me twice as long as it normally would have to get through these wonderful stories. Nobody needs me to talk about why Shirley Jackson is an icon - truly, there isn't a single word out of place in any of these bangers - and now that I'm sort of used to her cadence, I'm going to miss being able to rely on her satisfying twists. 

There's an assortment of delights here, some focused on the spooky and supernatural, others dark fantasy, still others the disturbingly dark side of humanity. Some of these stories are predictable - telegraphed by the title - and others sneak up on you, landing with a heart-thumping jolt. Some will really stick with me. I woke up one morning thinking about Louisa, Please Come Home, and The Bus - my favorite - will probably dance around in my head for weeks. I'll defend the perfect end of The Summer People to anyone who asks.

As always, Shirley explores - I would maybe even say, turns upside down - themes such as family, memory, small towns, marriage, friendship, and seems to delight in painting for us the many faces of evil. Each story is like an episode of The Twilight Zone, with slightly different levels of noise and flavor and tone. Not all of them are accessible (The Honeymoon of Mrs. Smith is kind of opaque), but all of them are a joy to read. She's a master at distracting you - immersing you - before pulling out the rug.

Dark Tales is a classic that belongs as part of the horror curriculum. I look forward to slowly making my way through all of the Shirley classics, because it's nice to gulp down her crunchy prose, but also, it's fun to see how her legacy lives on in the horror it has inspired. Don't make my mistake - this is not meant for April/May. Read this in October.

Dark Tales on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Gothic

3 stars. Horror about horror writers irks me a bit - Stephen King does it (and everything else) well, but think like... Kill Creek, or that one episode of Creepshow about the hat - eerily similar to this book, actually - these premises, they smell like... stale desperation, and maybe even a little resentment. I get it - writing is fucking hard!! the pressure!! the reality of it!! sounds pretty horrific!! - but I've read or encountered enough of these premises that I react almost like ... yeah, I get it. Writing is fucking hard, the pressure of it, the reality of it, yadda yadda yadda. Sure, why not, let's go meta with it. Fine. You were staring at a blank page, so you developed a concept around staring at a blank page. Girl, I guess so. 

This book is about an evil, murderous desk. Acquired by an aging, formerly best selling horror author - after being hunted down and chased by various evildoers and powerseekers over the centuries - the desk wreaks havoc on the author's life, career, and relationships. Previously some sort of sacrificial altar, the desk uses the author for its nefarious purposes and spreads its darkness and damage throughout society.

A few things that also really grated: the female characters, the try-hard humor in the inner monologuing of every character, the commentary on romantic relationships, the oddly-placed sexual references (as well as some of the other instances of, shall we say, low-brow jokes - not against them in general! Just when they give me the ick), and the excessive use of figurative language. There is also some pretty seriously awful fatphobia. Maybe this stuff was meant to be a throwback to the pulps from the 70s/80s, but it fell really flat for me. And structurally, I think this could've been better as a short novella, or a much longer, expanded, epic saga, with fleshed out characters and longer arcs.

All that being said: sometimes you just really need a bloody, angsty, feudal, vengeful, crazy, twisted, disgusting, basically classic piece of horror. Just the usual stuff - soaked in a delicious type of inky evil that's fun if not fresh. A fun horror beach read, if, like me, you enjoy reading the dark stuff in the sun.

Gothic on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Lone Women

4 stars. I love a good mystery box - in this case, a literal mystery box - and I love when it's utilized in unique ways. In this book it's blended nicely with horror and lends itself to a nearly perfect premise; it certainly kept me engaged for the first half of the book. The big reveal was interesting and fascinating. Lone Women is bound to make you think.

It follows Adelaide Henry on her move from California to Montana in the early 1900s. She carries an impossibly heavy steamer trunk, and is looking to disappear. Big Sandy welcomes her at first, providing a sense of community in the town's quest to survive the harsh landscape. But Adelaide can't settle, nor can the town be at peace; her trunk holds a very dangerous secret, and they all must learn to survive it.

A must-read for horror fans, especially ones looking to scratch an itch for something Western. It's compelling, unique, and intense. I docked a star because it felt a little like the author... pantsed it, for lack of a better word - no outline, no plotting in advance, just writing as the narrative came to him - and I think the characters suffer slightly for it. This isn't necessarily a complaint, but certain elements felt very... random.

Still, it's so much fun. Definitely unpredictable (except for one certain character's "twist"). Maybe a little cheesy. The opportunity to explore this time and place is very welcome. I'm a little unclear on a few things, but that's fine. What I gleaned and learned and chewed on reading this book made it entirely worthwhile.

Lone Women on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: I Remember You

3 stars. I really treasure Scandinavian noir - especially mysteries/thrillers set in Iceland. I've been twice and - at the risk of offending any locals - feel very at home there. And yes, it really does present a perfect backdrop to explore the dark side of humanity. Unfortunately, this one didn't really capture me the way I was hoping it would - I'll get into why, but it doesn't mean I don't recommend it - it's obviously a successful contribution to the genre. 

I Remember You weaves together two tales: 1) that of a married couple who travel to an isolated village with their widowed friend to fix up an old house, and 2) that of a psychiatrist investigating the vandalism of a school that is seemingly connected to the disappearance of his young son. The main players in both stories have disturbing supernatural experiences that unravel clues and push revelations with devastating consequences for everyone involved.

Pros: the setting - omg - I just love it. Such a unique type of remoteness out there in Iceland, especially in winter. Some of the spooky moments are very well done, invoking imagery just begging for adaptation. The ending, as well, really took things to a place I admire. That final page almost had me forgiving some of the things I didn't enjoy.

Cons: predictable. Unlikeable characters - and not the crunchy, interesting kind - the bland, annoying kind. Perhaps one too many narrative elements/connections, many of which had me sort of scratching my head trying to piece things together. I practically skimmed a lot of it... I just wasn't hooked. I couldn't concentrate on it.

I would recommend this as a bridge between Scandi noir/crime thrillers and horror. It's gateway scary - maybe a little amateurish. But that doesn't mean it's bad; only that I'm maybe not the right audience. Still, I found myself wishing for a lot more here. 

I Remember You on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Fantasticland

3 stars. I have a LOT to say, so let's dive right in.

Fantasticland tells the story of a group of young amusement park employees who, after being trapped in the park by a hurricane, divide into "tribes" and essentially go to war with each other until they are rescued. It's a brutal, outlandish, fantastic premise. Think: heads on spikes. Violence for the sake of it. Tribe "rules"; a twisted Fight Club sense of honor. Girls being taken. Scarcity mindset despite ample resources. Archers. Stabbings. Bystander apathy. Groupthink. 

It's also an epistolary novel - each chapter transcribes an interview with a survivor. So it's vaguely found footage-y and gives us multiple angles from which to examine the tragedy. We hear from park personnel, park guests who escaped in time, the rescuers, the park owner, and ultimately members of each "tribe." Each chapter is a fascinating snack.

I really did enjoy it. It's a must-read for horror fans as it comes across as pretty refreshing and quirky and fucking fun. Some of the details are truly outstanding and make the whole book worthwhile. The ideas behind each "tribe" are super effective, and the nods to pop culture and social media and other famous theme parks are interesting.

I think, though, that this is a case of iffy execution. It sort of felt like the author wrote his central thesis - Lord of the Flies in Disneyworld. Then he did a writing exercise: anticipate every hole a reader could poke in the plausibility of this thesis. Then he spent the entire book attempting - not always successfully - to fill those holes. Some of the details he included, I swear, it was like I could hear a beta reader or an editor asking "but what about phones" and "why would there be tunnels," resulting in explanations that often felt tedious or worth editing. Sometimes you just have to trust that a reader will suspend disbelief and enjoy the ride. So to speak. 

I would also point out that a lot of the character voices were indistinguishable to me. If you're going to write multiple POVs, you'd better lock down - and practice utilizing - clear and distinct features for each one, because throwing in a few slang words, abbreviations, jokes, or curse words won't really cut it. Many of the young people - I really hate to say. this- just didn't sound that young to me.

Finally, I did have to do a lot of referencing back. I dunno if my memory is shot and tired right now or something, but I could not keep track of the names. Many times I felt like I was being thrown an Easter Egg, but I couldn't quite recognize it or piece things together.

I think a lot of this just indicates that it's a story begging for a rework, maybe even an adaptation. The whole thing read like it was sort of ... almost there, adjacent to the real story, but not quite what it could have been. Gaps, weak perspectives, a bland ending, etc. But it really is - truly - a bloody fun time. I would love to see it in film format. Or a miniseries. Or a Last of Us type thing with a different character focus each episode. 

ANYWAY. 

Yes, thank you for asking, I would join the Circus Freaks. Those are my people, without a doubt.

Fantasticland on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Silver Nitrate

3 stars. It took me forever to get through this - I should've been absolutely clawing at my Kindle to read just one more chapter, but ultimately the style never really pulled me in. I agree with the reviews that call this a rough draft, even if that was the author's intention - the whole thing felt very sketchy, and repetitive, and frankly very odd at times. The "scary" moments are few and far between, I could barely grasp the "rules" of the magic system/some of the worldbuilding, and honestly sometimes I had trouble paying attention - especially toward the end, when the random instances of lengthy exposition got more frequent. 

I also agree with the reviews that praise this book's premise. It truly is an inspired, wonderful concept/idea, with layers and layers of delicious lore to explore. It's what got me interested in the first place; and, having read and loved Mexican Gothic, I was pretty excited to dive into something from the same author. It's about two best friends, Montserrat and Tristan, who are recruited by the latter's mysterious neighbor - a former horror director - to help him complete a film, thus closing the loop of a magic spell he opened back during the initial filming. Cue unexpected consequences, side effects, a crash course in rune magic, nefarious characters, and an undead Nazi cult leader.

Sounds pretty wild, right? Yes, all the elements of this story are wild and interesting and out there and full of amazing, Old Hollywood vibes. Montserrat and Tristan are easy to root for and classic horror references abound. But somehow, when all of these elements come together, the mixture reads incredibly dry, dusty, and bland. I don't know how to put my finger on it - it just doesn't deliver on the writing front. It snags and catches where it should flow and glisten.

I think this story would've been better-suited for a tv series, or even just one single episode of X-Files or The Twilight Zone or something. Maybe it would've been a great short story, part of an anthology. As a book, it really needs some editing, or reworking, or something. I'll say, though, that I really admire this author for the idea, and for going for it. It's ballsy, with a wonderful setting and a few great sequences - and I was even pretty charmed by the end. Can't wait to read more of her work. 

Silver Nitrate on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Where the Chill Waits

4 stars! I spent 75% of this absolutely terrified for the dogs, even skimming certain parts, until I finally caved and looked it up (thanks, Reddit!). So, so relieved - overjoyed, even - that I don't have to dock a star for this one. It would've been almost forgivable considering that sort of thing was maybe less of a trope when the book was published, but I wouldn't have budged. A rule is a rule.

Three men are invited by their boss on a fishing trip, a sort of corporate tradition he utilizes to measure up a man's worth. It's all very toxic CEO of him, and the men are worried about repercussions if they refuse. It gets even worse when he spontaneously switches their destination and declares it a hunting trip instead - in a remote part of Canada he bought sight unseen to connect with nature. Or something. The men are met by a local guide and venture into the woods. It's not long before things start to go wrong. 

I'm a huge fan of forest horror, and wendigo horror, and Where the Chill Waits exquisitely checks both of those boxes. It's a classic and should be more widely-read. Reminded me of King at times, with its deep characterization and amusing details. And, also like some of King's older works, it betrays its age with an annoying female character, and some questionable culture-clashing. But it earns top grades for premise, pacing, and entertainment factor.

I would honestly love to do a deep analysis of how the plot escalates episodically. I just want to talk with someone about some of the scarier moments and insane imagery and the individual character arcs. The book is begging for that type of exchange: "how brutal was it when XYZ..." "can you believe he did this or that..." "OMG when so-and-so turned into the so-and-so..." "the part with the arm..." "the END!!!" 

Truly some of the best writing I've encountered. Crisp and fast-paced, the author really succeeds at driving the story along lightly - incorporating some lovely nature writing, too! I mentioned the female character - I personally can't stand worriers, and Janet is a particularly self-righteous one - to a distracting degree. The Native American lore would earn some major hand-wringing today, but I think it's still worth reading with a discerning eye.

I can't wait to revisit this on a road trip, or a camping trip, or a hike. Around a campfire, or on a couch in a cabin in the woods. It's easily up there on my favorites list. Spread the word!

"Hell, he thought, here even the stars take you off-guard. If you can stand and stare skyward with your jaw hung in wonder, how can you dismiss anything?"

Where the Chill Waits on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Silent Companions

You know what? 5 stars. I was pretty much dead set on 4 until I reached the ending, which left me a little bit breathless and extremely satisfied. I'm very excited to read more by this author, who put together a really beautiful Gothic story here, employing a lot of fun and familiar tropes while managing to keep things fairly unpredictable. AND - I don't have to dock a star for a UDD - in this case - UCD! Small blessings.

There are two narratives here - well, almost three. In 1865, newly married Elsie Bainbridge must travel to her husband's isolated rural estate outside of London when he passes away unexpectedly. She is accompanied by her late husband's cousin, Sarah, and is met by an unwelcoming town and an unpleasant household staff. Even worse - the house itself is troublesome, and Elsie begins hearing things and seeing things that seem impossible. You know the drill.

Meanwhile, we are supplied with the journal of an ancestor, who lived on the estate in 1635. She and her husband are overjoyed to receive a royal visit, until things go horribly wrong - revealing an evil that may or may not be connected to Elsie's experiences over two hundred years later.

Yes, this does seem a bit like the same-old haunted house story... but it really does take some delightful twists and turns. Scarier than The Little Stranger I'd say, but in a good way. The writing is super lively, the plot is very well-crafted/well-paced, the ending is brutal, and the setting is perfectly spooky. The characters are pretty unlikeable, especially at first, but everything comes across as intentional. I am a little frustrated by some of the loose ends - I need more lore! And I could use a sequel! - but I was truly transported and enjoyed myself.

I will say too - at first, I found Hetta's ... instruments, shall we say ... extremely cheesy and not scary at all. Maybe a little gimmicky? Despite some fantastic imagery and vivid descriptions of their appearances and expressions, I think I just had some trouble crossing the bridge into fear. I kept getting caught up in the physics of it all - picturing them... glide across the floor or whatever. Also, where the F did they come from in the first place? A mysterious, disappearing shop out of nowhere on top of everything else?! So much going on.

Overall, though - an instant horror classic. Must be read in front of a crackling fire during a blizzard, wind howling against the windows.

The Silent Companions on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Heart-Shaped Box

3 stars. I can see why this is so popular, and considered one of Hill's very best. It's hardcore horror with a lot of flavors: rock and roll, road trips, occult artifacts; along with bigger themes about abuse, justice, punishment, retribution, heaven and hell and all that fun stuff. Jude makes a helluva main character, full of rebellion and rage and a kind of a dark stubbornness that triggers - and resolves - the evil at the center of the story.

An aging rock star, Jude is tempted via the internet to "buy a ghost." He purchases a haunted suit for his collection of occult items, and haunted it turns out to be. As the spirit of his ex's stepfather (lol, it's complicated) makes his life a living hell, Jude is forced to make a journey: into the unknown, into the depths of his own trauma and psyche, into the past. He thrives in the dark, after all.

Technically, this is a wonderful book. It's well-written - better than NOS4A2, I think. I didn't find it to be particularly scary - Craddock is just a teensy-weensy bit too cartoonish for me (the tip of the hat, for ex), but I really, really loved him as a threat. He's a very classic, powerful, ghostly villain and I especially loved his introduction. I also enjoyed the references to heavy metal and the surprisingly unusual exploration of an aging rock star. Jude is adorably cliche and ugly and menacing with a solid core.

It really is a very, very fun story. I'm giving it 3 stars because I would've given it 4 and was forced to dock for not one but two UDDs. In fact, I basically skimmed 4 entire chapters because of it. I know, I know - it's my trigger, my problem. But this sort of thing just doesn't seem creative to me, anymore. It's trope-y and cheap.

I have no regrets. I read a lot of horror and I really respect this one - I call it great. A very hearty, tasty, classic-feeling snack. First read of 2023 down.

Heart-Shaped Box on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Hidden Pictures

3 stars. Hmmmm hahahaha. This kept my attention - I read it in less than 24 hours; I'd definitely describe it as a crisply-written thriller - but it didn't blow me away at all. I'm kind of surprised, actually, about all the hype. 

Mallory Quinn is a young athlete in recovery who takes a job as a babysitter for a seemingly perfect, well-off family to watch their 5-year-old son, Teddy. She settles in and the summer is enjoyable - until Teddy starts presenting her with some mysterious drawings. Drawings that are way too advanced for a 5-year-old, depicting some very dark, mysterious images. Between a psychic neighbor, odd noises, and some strange behavior from Teddy's parents, Mallory begins to realize the genuine danger she faces, and resolves to get to the bottom of things and save Teddy if she can.

Regarding the controversy around the depiction of gender: I am fortunate enough to not be easily-triggered by this sort of thing. If you are sensitive to such issues, avoid. I could give the whole spiel - depiction does not equal endorsement, etc. and agonize over what is harmful and what is not... but there are folks far more informed and articulate than I who can speak on that, and I highly encourage you to seek them out. (I will say the references to Harry Potter made me extremely suspicious.)

So here's what I'd say: read it if you're in the mood for a compelling page turner with supernatural elements and a few twists. I would barely describe it as horror. I would even put a YA label on it - it gave me those vibes more than once. I think it kind of frustrated me that the first chapter was a real banger, and had me totally hooked before things kind of took a few... odd turns. 5-star opening chapter, 3 star book as a whole. I didn't totally find Mallory plausible, nor did I fully believe Ted's ultimate inclinations. Adrian was too good to be true... so yeah. 3 stars. 

Hidden Pictures on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads